It is my great pleasure and honour to announce that I’ve finished the book!
As I’ve no intention of boring you to death, I’ll skip the bit about the book being a children’s novel J and proceed with my analysis.
![]() |
| The University of Texas at Austin, College of Fine Arts-Theatre production |
The plot is well thought out and nicely structured. The drastic switch of the stories (Stanley’s-his no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather’s &Kate Barlow’s), is quite a common technique to grab the readers’ attention, which seems to work well in this case. Also there seems to be a lot of repetition going on throughout the whole story but I’m not sure if that’s considered to be a flaw or a strength in the author’s writing style. Take the verbal and factual repetition of the word “Girl Scouts” for example, for me at least, the over-usage of this word killed the carefully injected irony at the end of the story. (Mr. Sir is constantly reminding the boys that they aren’t at a Girl Scout Camp and in the end Camp Green Lake becomes a Girl Scout Camp.)
The fact that the separately told stories of Stanley, his no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather and Kate Barlow turn out to be all closely connected with each other, leads to a satisfactory ending. However, apart from being satisfactory, these connections also prove to be rather predictable and I daresay primitive, as they don’t come as much of a surprise to the reader. (The curse wears off when Stanley carries Zero up the mountain.) Thus, for the curious and enquiring mind, it’ll simply fail to suffice.
w:248
And with these last words, I bid my farewell to you all.
![]() |
| :) |






